Skip to main content

why you see what I see...for the most part....

I find that running is an excellent activity to be engaged in when I need my mind to wander, the mind walks I've taken while so engaged have revealed the solution to many difficult problems in my code and design of a distributed web application framework. The freedom of thought inspired by this part of my day often inspires entirely unrelated ideas to my current line of work. Case in point was an idea that I explored while running several months ago. As I concentrated on breathing and keeping my form optimal for my pace, I took a moment to fully experience the vivid colors of the city and of nature that passed me as I ran. I thought to myself of an idea that I'd come across much earlier in my life as a high school student but then had not the knowledge to answer the question.

The question is thus: Why do you and I experience color the same way?

Having gained knowledge on how the human visual system works, as well as how the brain-eye system processes visual stimulation the answer follows from simply traversing the path of photons as they enter the eye. The journey proceeds as follows. The first stage involves photons of various energies released or reflected by the surrounding environment in the direction of the eye. Electromagnetic theory tells us that photon energy corresponds to photon wavelength in a definite way by way of the equation:

E = hv

where E is the energy , h is the Planck constant and v is not the Roman "vee" but rather the greek symbol "nu" and represents the frequency of the propagating photon. Since frequency is inversely related to wavelength , the equation could be written as:

E= h/w

where w is now the wavelength of the propagating photon. I won't get into the potentially sticky area of photons as propagating particles versus propagating waves, Physicists learned that in order for electromagnetic equations to provide consistent results both interpretations are required depending on what is happening at the interaction point. For our journey the interaction occurs at the back of the human retina, but before we get there, a bit about the wavelength and energy. It just so happens that photons with high frequency (therefore low wavelength) have higher energy than photons with low frequency or high wavelength. In my time studying quantum mechanics I've conceptualized this as a measure of the interaction probability for the propagating photon. High energy photons have high interaction probabilities while lower ones have lower interaction probabilities...unfortunately this fails to hold. The curious nature in which matter absorbs energy in quantized packets means that it is possible for high frequency photons to be completely ignored by certain materials if the quantum states required to stimulate those materials are not triggered. In particular, the mechanism of stimulation employed by eyes involves stimulation of photosensitive enzymes in the rod and cone sensors in the back of our retinas. The rods are sensitive to ANY photon energy while the cones have specific filter ranges of sensitivity. Like the aformentioned surfaces, the enzymes that form the sensitive material of these rods and codes reacts in specific ways. The rods are sensitive to a plethora of energies across the electromagnetic spectrum thus making them good gauges of intensity, where the cones have specific violet, red-blue and yellow-green sensitivity ranges. The perception of a rainbow of colors comes from our brains synthesis of the many signals coming from these tiny cones. These sensitivites are provided by enzymes that have specific molecular construction that is stimulated when photons of given energies or ranges impinge them. The molecules absorb part of the energy and emit additional photons that propagate down the optic nerve in a cascade of triggered stimulation and emmissions. Eventually these signals reach the brains visual system and are synethesized into the perceptions of color that we have.

The answer to the question of why we see the same is in fact hidden in the mechanism of transition. The cones consist of specific types, that will be stimulated only when photons having the required energy impacts them, the mechanism for this is explained by quantum jumps of photons from high to low orbital positions. These gap jumps are always the same because the unique molecules are constructed of the exact same elements. Thus a 445 nm photon hitting a cone sensitive to that wavelength of energy will always kick an electron to a different orbital and in so doing release a photon of a specific energy in return...thus continuing the cascade. The point is the underlying physics of the molecules is what normalizes the response to the original photons at the rod and cone sensitive surfaces. All photons that do not induce stimulation at a cone are filtered out of the response leaving only the pure responses to fixed energies. Since these responses are tied to the enzymes used to transmit the signal to the brain, and these enzymes are the same ones used in all human beings , the response at the brain processing region must be the same. However this is not sufficient to conclude that the "perception" of stimuli will be the same. Here is the consistency of neuronal cells comes into play, whatever neurotransmitters that are responsible for relaying the visual signals (now normalized) they cause the same effects at the neurons, so long as the quantities of neuronal stimulation are similar the perception will be the same. Note the key phrase "so long as", there are in fact examples of perception being different for different people. People with color blindness for example see a skewed pallette as a result of a different filtering of the stimuli at the rods and cones, similarly variations in the neurotransmitters between people can similarly lead to warped perceptions (as may be experienced by those under the effects of psychoactive drugs or other brain modifying agents) so the answer is not as cut and dried as it may seem to be from the outset. Perception does change when ever any stage of the stimulation, neurotransmission or neuronal processing is effected, otherwise the preeminence of the physics (the underlying photon stimulated emission cascades) leads to similar perceptions for all.


Popular posts from this blog

Highly targeted Cpg vaccine immunotherapy for a range of cancer


This will surely go down as a seminal advance in cancer therapy. It reads like magic:

So this new approach looks for the specific proteins that are associated with a given tumors resistance to attack by the body's T cells, it then adjusts those T cells to be hyper sensitive to the specific oncogenic proteins targeted. These cells become essentially The Terminator​ T cells in the specific tumor AND have the multiplied effect of traveling along the immune pathway of spreading that the cancer many have metastasized. This is huge squared because it means you can essentially use targeting one tumor to identify and eliminate distal tumors that you many not even realize exist.

This allows the therapy for treating cancer to, for the first time; end the "wack a mole" problem that has frustrated traditional shot gun methods of treatment involving radiation and chemotherapy ...which by their nature unfortunately damage parts of the body that are not cancer laden but …

Engineers versus Programmers

I have found as more non formally trained people enter the coding space, the quality of code that results varies in an interesting way.

The formalities of learning to code in a structured course at University involve often strong focus on "correctness" and efficiency in the form of big O representations for the algorithms created.

Much less focus tends to be placed on what I'll call practical programming, which is the type of code that engineers (note I didn't use "programmers" on purpose) must learn to write.

Programmers are what Universities create, students that can take a defined development environment and within in write an algorithm for computing some sequence or traversing a tree or encoding and decoding a string. Efficiency and invariant rules are guiding development missions. Execution time for creating the solution is often a week or more depending on the professor and their style of teaching code and giving out problems. This type of coding is devo…

First *extra Galactic* planetary scale bodies observed

This headline

So every so often I see a story that has me sitting at the keyboard for a few seconds...actually trying to make sure the story is not some kind of satire site because the headline reads immediately a nonsense.
This headline did just that.
So I proceeded to frantically click through and it appears it was a valid news item from a valid news source and my jaw hit the floor.
Many of you know that we've been finding new planets outside of our solar system for about 25 years now.
In fact the Kepler satellite and other ground observatories have been accelerating their rate of extra-solar planet discoveries in the last few years but those planets are all within our galaxy the Milky Way.
The three major methods used to detect the bulk of planets thus far are wobble detection, radial transit and this method micro lensing which relies on a gravitational effect that was predicted by Einstein in his general theory of relativity exactly 103 years ago.