Skip to main content

the illusion of a grand audience

Facebook has been rising in the ranks as one of the best known and used social networks in the world. One of the reasons that facebook is so successful has to do with how it allows you to think that you are broadcasting your life to the world. It enables you to add contacts to your list and broadcast your ideas, actions and events to them usign the various feeds of content and status that are available but this provides an illusion, namely the feeling that a larger audience is "listening" to your productions than just those people on your contact list. You may not think this at the moment that you are updating your profile with your latest status event but the fact that Facebook allows you to do this to your list, gives the illusion that you are broadcasting to the world...even if "world" is only a subset of those people on the Facebook site that can receive your feeds.

I think this is a powerful enticement for existing users to continue to post items to their profiles, weather they be images, video or audio files and links or just status updates. In this way Facebook emulates the abilities of several other social like networks that are attempting to focus on a particular area of expertise. For example, Facebook allows you to create galleries of images and upload your images to those galleries and then make those galleries available in a selective fashion to either the Facebook community or to your network or even to a specific number of users, this fine grained ability to segment how much of your content you expose to others makes it very much like the popular Flickr site..but it lacks many of the advanced and image specific features that ensure that Flickr is known as only a "photo sharing site" as opposed to a social network. If Facebook decided to, they could easily cannibalize the market of Flickr by adding extended image sharing capabilities to their existing photo services. This would allow them to leverage the massive number of users being added to the Facebook platform on a daily basis and then direct them to use the expanding photo manipulation and presentation features. The same is true with regards to uploaded video files, Facebook could easily become more like Youtube by emulating the uploading features which that specialty site uses to define its uniqueness. Facebook can leverage the social aspect of its massive and rapidly growing network to steal users from those other services which are also very large but restricted only to specific actions. I doubt it will be long before Facebook decided to extend itself into these areas (and more) once it has reached what it deems to be sufficient critical mass (in terms of users) that it can constitute a viable competitor to the dedicated sites for hosting and sharing such content.

That said, the ideal distribution method for the average internet user is not to restrict it to specifid online silo's of distribution, rather people want to share content of any type, at any time with the specific set of people that they wish. Some content is desired to be available for general consumption but many businesses want to share content only with specific clients or with prospective clients at specific times. As it it is now the landscape lacks an option to provide this service for both businesses and consumers. Still, the illusion of a grand audience is a powerful motivating factor toward getting existing Facebook users to continue to send out status updates and upload media to the site thinking the entire world is actually listening to their broadcasts ...even when it is only restricted to those individuals on their friends list. ;)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On the idea of "world wide mush" resulting from "open" development models

A recent article posted in the Wall Street Journal posits that the collectivization of various types of goods or services created by the internet is long term a damaging trend for human societies.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703481004574646402192953052.html

I think that the author misses truths that have been in place that show that collectivization is not a process that started with the internet but has been with us since we started inventing things.

It seems that Mr. Lanier is not properly defining the contexts under which different problems can benefit or suffer from collectivization. He speaks in general terms of the loss of the potential for creators to extract profit from their work but misses that this is and was true of human civilization since we first picked up a rock to use as a crude hammer. New things make old things obsolete and people MUST adapt to what is displaced (be it a former human performance of that task or use of an older product) so as to main…

Highly targeted Cpg vaccine immunotherapy for a range of cancer

Significance?


This will surely go down as a seminal advance in cancer therapy. It reads like magic:

So this new approach looks for the specific proteins that are associated with a given tumors resistance to attack by the body's T cells, it then adjusts those T cells to be hyper sensitive to the specific oncogenic proteins targeted. These cells become essentially The Terminator​ T cells in the specific tumor AND have the multiplied effect of traveling along the immune pathway of spreading that the cancer many have metastasized. This is huge squared because it means you can essentially use targeting one tumor to identify and eliminate distal tumors that you many not even realize exist.

This allows the therapy for treating cancer to, for the first time; end the "wack a mole" problem that has frustrated traditional shot gun methods of treatment involving radiation and chemotherapy ...which by their nature unfortunately damage parts of the body that are not cancer laden but …

First *extra Galactic* planetary scale bodies observed

This headline


Significance?
So every so often I see a story that has me sitting at the keyboard for a few seconds...actually trying to make sure the story is not some kind of satire site because the headline reads immediately a nonsense.
This headline did just that.
So I proceeded to frantically click through and it appears it was a valid news item from a valid news source and my jaw hit the floor.
Many of you know that we've been finding new planets outside of our solar system for about 25 years now.
In fact the Kepler satellite and other ground observatories have been accelerating their rate of extra-solar planet discoveries in the last few years but those planets are all within our galaxy the Milky Way.
The three major methods used to detect the bulk of planets thus far are wobble detection, radial transit and this method micro lensing which relies on a gravitational effect that was predicted by Einstein in his general theory of relativity exactly 103 years ago.
https://exoplanet…