Skip to main content

Diversity saves....

Access to people from different regions of the world is good thing for several reasons. First, having other people from other places nearby or easily able to come by allows the chains of xenophobia that naturally forms between geographically disparate groups of people to wither in the face of constant interaction. Interaction does serve to strengthen some stereotypes but it tends to do it only in a minority of the respective populations that actually do inhabit the stereotypes of their group. The vast majority, silent majority as ever...only experiences what we (here online) already know...most people are just like us, have the same loves, hates, desires...and interests...despite their locations of origin.

The second reason has to do with linguistics, when people from different groups live together the pressure to pick up additional languages or words from those languages increases...for the young this is actually beneficial for the mind as multiple language cognition has been found to benefit individuals who've gained the skills as adults. It also enables those children to again be culturally exposed to those different languages and makes them less likely to acquire strong biases against the different groups.

Another reason comes from genetics, two populations that share genes create a more fit third population that shares traits from the original two. If in isolation groups have created specific mutations that tend to be carried within the group as detrimental or positive traits, mixing of the populations enables detrimental traits to thin out (as the percentage of their propagation goes down as in group individuals mate with out group individuals that do not carry the trait) and positive traits to propagate (as they are positive because they confer some survival advantage which likely extends beyond the originating geographic origin point).

The final reason in my view is that this type of interaction is actually beneficial for humanity, dare I say essential over the next few decades to allow the last fires of nationalism that burn in the hearts of many parts of the world to finally die out without conflagration into the conflicts we have going on currently derived from such heat. Chechnya...Kosovo...Darfur....ethnic/linguistic conflict has been the bread and butter of human violence for as long as humans could hurl a stone across a river and discover a people there that spoke differently, looked differently and prayed to different Gods. This last reason is secretly my prime reason for wanting to release numeroom.com eventually (once I launch it) to the consumer masses to enable a true language agnostic communication platform (not separate islands of language on one service) that will be used across devices to just make the idea of different language on such services irrelevant...whatever language you speak that is what you should see...weather or not those you are communicating with actually are typing in that language. Small scale systems for doing this have been built but no geographically scalable implementation with an "implicit" translation existed until I created one in numeroom.com (troubles with licensing translation tech. from google and other dictionary providers aside!)

Mixing humanity is key to our survival in this difficult time as we kill the oceans at rates unimagined 5 years ago, as we choke the skies with coal and as we denude the land of it's oxygen producing arboreal protections. Let us hope that we can embrace this diversity of experiences, lives, people and ideas to grow beyond the self destructive ways we currently exhibit.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

the attributes of web 3.0...

As the US economy continues to suffer the doldrums of stagnant investment in many industries, belt tightening budgets in many of the largest cities and continuous rounds of lay offs at some of the oldest of corporations, it is little comfort to those suffering through economic problems that what is happening now, has happened before. True, the severity of the downturn might have been different but the common factors of people and businesses being forced to do more with less is the theme of the times. Like environmental shocks to an ecosystem, stresses to the economic system lead to people hunkering down to last the storm, but it is instructive to realize that during the storm, all that idle time in the shelter affords people the ability to solve previous or existing problems. Likewise, economic downturns enable enterprising individuals and corporations the ability to make bold decisions with regard to marketing , sales or product focus that can lead to incredible gains as the economic

How many cofactors for inducing expression of every cell type?

Another revolution in iPSC technology announced: "Also known as iPS cells, these cells can become virtually any cell type in the human body -- just like embryonic stem cells. Then last year, Gladstone Senior Investigator Sheng Ding, PhD, announced that he had used a combination of small molecules and genetic factors to transform skin cells directly into neural stem cells. Today, Dr. Huang takes a new tack by using one genetic factor -- Sox2 -- to directly reprogram one cell type into another without reverting to the pluripotent state." -- So the method invented by Yamanaka is now refined to rely only 1 cofactor and b) directly generate the target cell type from the source cell type (skin to neuron) without the stem like intermediate stage.  It also mentions that oncogenic triggering was eliminated in their testing. Now comparative methods can be used to discover other types...the question is..is Sox2 critical for all types? It may be that skin to neuron relies on Sox2

AgilEntity Architecture: Action Oriented Workflow

Permissions, fine grained versus management headache The usual method for determining which users can perform a given function on a given object in a managed system, employs providing those Users with specific access rights via the use of permissions. Often these permissions are also able to be granted to collections called Groups, to which Users are added. The combination of Permissions and Groups provides the ability to provide as atomic a dissemination of rights across the User space as possible. However, this granularity comes at the price of reduced efficiency for managing the created permissions and more importantly the Groups that collect Users designated to perform sets of actions. Essentially the Groups serve as access control lists in many systems, which for the variable and often changing environment of business applications means a need to constantly update the ACL’s (groups) in order to add or remove individuals based on their ability to perform cert