Skip to main content

The coming age of SHI, Self Healing Infrastructure

I've had several lively discussions in the last few months about the possible implications of an increasingly automated society. As a designer of a system (Action Oriented Workflow) that is made to automate much of the completion of repetitive actions taken by employees in various lines of business this topic has been a focus of my analysis for nearly 10 years now. In the context of software designed to enable users to work on business critical object in applications designed for various verticals, this idea of automation requires the study of workflow interactions and business processes across multiple user and system interactions that can be distributed across the world. The problem space is huge and with AgilEntity platform I've created a solution that will generalize across verticals. The analog of AE in the physical realm though lies in the advances that are being made in the field of robots and the sister field AI, that is now enabling the creation of astonishingly life like robots in the ways that they "experience" the world and as well navigate within the world.

I recently had a discussion where I made the assertion that human beings are in a precarious position as far as automation of manual tasks is concerned. The last 10 years has seen the development of amazing technologies for enabling robots to ambulate and sense their surroundings without the massive amounts of computational muscle that were previously believed to be required prior to 15 years or so. The emergence of neural network and statistical methods for storing solution patterns to real time experienced situations and then comparing those patterns to in coming experiences has enabled the refinement of robotics to the point that natural walking quadrapedal and bipedal robots are on the horizon. Outstanding examples of both are found in the bigdog and petman projects of the DARPA funded Boston Dynamics. However, the advances will continue and they will accelerate as the various areas of cognitive function that we have in our brains are modeled using these techniques...eventually (within the next 20 years) we will have fully autonomous walking robots that ambulate and are as dexterous as the fluidity of human beings. I believe that beyond this point the ability for robots to completely take over the role of humans in the manufacturing sector will be complete. Once this is so, humans will be able to have robots find and extract the natural resources needed to build our world.

As AI continues to refine and cross sensory advances continue, robots will be able to understand and enhance their own construction, people like Ray Kurzwiel have talked on this subject matter but what interests me is not so much that robots will be able to build robots but that once they are able to do this, then we will be removed from the loop. Once robots can be enabled to build and repair their brethren, humans will be able to benefit from the efforts of the infrastructure of robots created to perform various tasks without requiring any investment, time or mental effort. We will be able to command the robots to perform actions for us and rest secure in their ability both to extract any necessary raw materials and fashion those raw materials into the required products.

The objections I've encountered involve the capitalistic aims of any organization or company that builds these robots. Will the heads of industry ever feel the need to relinquish their massive profit cow to the world in an effort to free man from all types of burden, will they emancipate their bots???? My argument is:

"The closer you get to the top of the mountain the easier it is to start an avalanche."

As these captains of future industry build their infrastructures and wealth, the pressure to perform a philanthropic act will mount. Just as Bill Gates and Warren Buffett have promised to donate the majority of their personal fortunes to the benefit of man, so to will these future philanthropists be willing to aid man once they've fattened their coffers enough. Some will chose not to, but all it takes is one individual to bring this idea to fruition. I believe that the age of the self healing infrastructure won't be with us for another 30 years but when it comes it will usher in a change in the history of humanity, we will go from reliant on our selves in every metric to gain survival to relying on the tools we have created and given the ability provide for us.


Leland said…
You are right. The sooner this comes the better. Perhaps more people can find it in themselves to make this the guiding goal in their lives... the more people working towards utopia the faster we will get there.

Popular posts from this blog

On the idea of "world wide mush" resulting from "open" development models

A recent article posted in the Wall Street Journal posits that the collectivization of various types of goods or services created by the internet is long term a damaging trend for human societies.

I think that the author misses truths that have been in place that show that collectivization is not a process that started with the internet but has been with us since we started inventing things.

It seems that Mr. Lanier is not properly defining the contexts under which different problems can benefit or suffer from collectivization. He speaks in general terms of the loss of the potential for creators to extract profit from their work but misses that this is and was true of human civilization since we first picked up a rock to use as a crude hammer. New things make old things obsolete and people MUST adapt to what is displaced (be it a former human performance of that task or use of an older product) so as to main…

Engineers versus Programmers

I have found as more non formally trained people enter the coding space, the quality of code that results varies in an interesting way.

The formalities of learning to code in a structured course at University involve often strong focus on "correctness" and efficiency in the form of big O representations for the algorithms created.

Much less focus tends to be placed on what I'll call practical programming, which is the type of code that engineers (note I didn't use "programmers" on purpose) must learn to write.

Programmers are what Universities create, students that can take a defined development environment and within in write an algorithm for computing some sequence or traversing a tree or encoding and decoding a string. Efficiency and invariant rules are guiding development missions. Execution time for creating the solution is often a week or more depending on the professor and their style of teaching code and giving out problems. This type of coding is devo…

AgilEntity Architecture: Action Oriented Workflow

Permissions, fine grained versus management headache
The usual method for determining which users can perform a given function on a given object in a managed system, employs providing those Users with specific access rights via the use of permissions. Often these permissions are also able to be granted to collections called Groups, to which Users are added. The combination of Permissions and Groups provides the ability to provide as atomic a dissemination of rights across the User space as possible. However, this granularity comes at the price of reduced efficiency for managing the created permissions and more importantly the Groups that collect Users designated to perform sets of actions. Essentially the Groups serve as access control lists in many systems, which for the variable and often changing environment of business applications means a need to constantly update the ACL’s (groups) in order to add or remove individuals based on their ability to perform certain actions. Also, the…