Skip to main content

Delusions of Grand Audience

Over two years ago I mentioned how the social interaction on FB enables what I called the fostering of an illusion of grand audience. The idea is that the pseudo public nature of discourse on an FB wall leads people to place more importance on personal appearance than they would on a less socially constructed web site.

It's all part of the interesting psychology that people manifest while participating in this pseudo-public space called a Facebook profile. It is the digital equivalent of a podium on a stage that has flood lights obscuring your view of the audience. You know that people are there because you hear them but you can't exactly see them all (analog of not knowing who sees what you post or reads it) this does an interesting thing to people. First, when challenged while on their "stage" they are far more likely to react with a defensive posture on many subjects that in reality they would be for more reasonable discussing. I've been perplexed by the harsh tone some people I know on FB have taken that seems like a contrast to the character of them I know in person...that said, it is easy for this magnified personality and feeling of self importance, coupled with the fear of "public" shame to really lead people down a path of paranoia.

If you do draw their ire, they may feel sufficiently offended to de-friend. There was an FB friend I had on my list for about a year, he was a smart computer programmer from Canada. I friend requested him because he was good at defending his self logically for the most part but he would never admit being wrong if pushed to that logical end. He also had a habit of asserting his greatness in programming out of the blue, we had many debates regarding Engineering and programming where I would enjoy mildly ribbing him over one statement or another (we were fully in super pedantic mode and though he didn't slip often when he did I made him pay for it)...but it seems he never liked it.

Finally a couple of months ago I posted an article about Star Trek Enterprise (the tv series now off the air) he took great offense at the fact that I interpreted the way the series ended in a different way from him...so much so that soon after that discussion (which was cordial outside of his making the accusation that he knew more about Star Trek than me...but failing to actually show it) I found I couldn't view his profile. He had defriended me over a Star Trek discussion! So I say good riddance to any one that takes themselves so seriously that they expect to always appear correct in every interaction that happens on their profile and feel slighted at being censured in this pseudo public forum. It is a delusion of grand audience that magnifies existing quirks in personality to ugly viewable size...I like it...helps us separate the horribly included stones from the diamond quality friends we ideally would all like to have!

So when you are next on FB do a little observation of your friends responses to various statements online as compared to how they would react in person. How big is the gap? I think the difference hints at the level of delusion of self importance that person has...hmmm...now if only there was a way to capture this delta and exploit it. *grin*

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

the attributes of web 3.0...

As the US economy continues to suffer the doldrums of stagnant investment in many industries, belt tightening budgets in many of the largest cities and continuous rounds of lay offs at some of the oldest of corporations, it is little comfort to those suffering through economic problems that what is happening now, has happened before. True, the severity of the downturn might have been different but the common factors of people and businesses being forced to do more with less is the theme of the times. Like environmental shocks to an ecosystem, stresses to the economic system lead to people hunkering down to last the storm, but it is instructive to realize that during the storm, all that idle time in the shelter affords people the ability to solve previous or existing problems. Likewise, economic downturns enable enterprising individuals and corporations the ability to make bold decisions with regard to marketing , sales or product focus that can lead to incredible gains as the economic

How many cofactors for inducing expression of every cell type?

Another revolution in iPSC technology announced: "Also known as iPS cells, these cells can become virtually any cell type in the human body -- just like embryonic stem cells. Then last year, Gladstone Senior Investigator Sheng Ding, PhD, announced that he had used a combination of small molecules and genetic factors to transform skin cells directly into neural stem cells. Today, Dr. Huang takes a new tack by using one genetic factor -- Sox2 -- to directly reprogram one cell type into another without reverting to the pluripotent state." -- So the method invented by Yamanaka is now refined to rely only 1 cofactor and b) directly generate the target cell type from the source cell type (skin to neuron) without the stem like intermediate stage.  It also mentions that oncogenic triggering was eliminated in their testing. Now comparative methods can be used to discover other types...the question is..is Sox2 critical for all types? It may be that skin to neuron relies on Sox2

AgilEntity Architecture: Action Oriented Workflow

Permissions, fine grained versus management headache The usual method for determining which users can perform a given function on a given object in a managed system, employs providing those Users with specific access rights via the use of permissions. Often these permissions are also able to be granted to collections called Groups, to which Users are added. The combination of Permissions and Groups provides the ability to provide as atomic a dissemination of rights across the User space as possible. However, this granularity comes at the price of reduced efficiency for managing the created permissions and more importantly the Groups that collect Users designated to perform sets of actions. Essentially the Groups serve as access control lists in many systems, which for the variable and often changing environment of business applications means a need to constantly update the ACL’s (groups) in order to add or remove individuals based on their ability to perform cert