Skip to main content

"bet the farm moment"

You'll recall from this post, that I had decided to mount up my trusty steed and head down the road of venture capital and angel investment hunting about 2 weeks ago. It turns out that process is far more difficult than I thought it would be. I had the idea that IT folks would be willing to take a look at the implementation of my technology and be in a position to enter into an agreement to provide a portion of the funding. It just turns out that getting eyes on your product is not easy, even in the internet age. The first worry I had was the fact that most VC's wanted to see a business plan or an executive summary before they even agree to anything. Though my executive summary was general in its description of my business ideas, the business plan is quite detailed. I kept thinking, what is to stop them from passing that plan along to a few geeks they have waiting and funding their own version of my plan idea? The internet is filled with stories that go both ways, of investors that claim their inventions were stolen by people they presented to, and by investors in the industry claiming they have no desire to do such things. I decided after all this reading that it was simply not worth it, to show them my secret sauce. Now most VC's only ask for an executive summary, and I did send out about 8 of these before I decided to quit but I still feel as if I let my genie out of the bottle a bit by having sent it to these guys.

I also considered getting a small business loan, but quickly found out that there is a catch22 in place. Most banks (though I only visited one) want to fund already profitable businesses, since mine has no profit yet I could get no small business funding from them. So that option was quickly invalidated. I also had some interest expressed by some acquantances and family members as angels but they both fell into financial straits that prevents them from contributing. I'd been so focused on development that I've done little networking in the field in the last few years so essentially, no one (anyone that would be in a position to fund the launch) knows who I am. I concluded that if anyone knows the potential of my technology it is me, and by understanding my industry and the niches that my product and services was designed to appeal to, I have a level of confidence that the VC's could never see, even in a well written executive summary. All that said, I didn't get a single bite from those 8 or so VC reach outs, but that was not the reason why I decided to self fund, the reason mainly is simply one of pride. I worked hard on the technology to make it what it is and I should reap all rewards for its success and likewise bare all responsibility should it fail. I also feel that it would be unfair to me, to cop out by having a VC fund the project at the cost of a significant loss of my ownership of something I created 100% if it succeeds. One of my strong beliefs is that being independent of the monetary concerns of any investors is critical to allowing me to cater to the needs of the customer FIRST, before any other considerations. When you go VC, no matter how much you try, there will come time to make decisions that punish the customer because the investors want to save their rumps in some way or boost profit in a way that is not aligned with the original vision of the product or service. Self funding ensures I am the only captain on the ship, and there won't be any mutinies.

So, having mulled all this, I thought to myself do I self fund if I am flat out of money? I have whittled away just of $70,000 on the development process while in stealth mode for the last 6 years. That includes my living expenses, a car bought and trashed and a European vacation. I realized I might have had the funds for the self funding if I hadn't put so much money in the stock market, oh well one of my financial mistakes from the last 7 years! Regardless, I have a few thousand in cash and all my other money is untouchable in retirement savings. What to do??? Eureka! I remembered that I had two credit cards, both started when I was in college. In fact these two cards were part of my plans just before graduation to get a college loan and use it to pay for a brand new computer, that I could then employ in my post graduation job hunt. It turned out to be an excellent investment at the time and it worked! The credit card accounts were opened up to pay for the computer parts which were successfully used to land my first post graduate job, but today over 10 years later, those cards are my salvation. Fastidious attention to paying my balances in total every time I had them, allowed the credit limits on both cards to rise steadily. Combined both cards provide me with $30,000 of credit equity.

As loath as I am to fund my site launch on credit cards, it provides me several advantages that I could not otherwise get if I pursue the VC route.

  1. Time, I don't have time to spend hunting VC's and Angels down and begging for money. I need to launch the site now and start marketing. The sooner it is up, the sooner I can start taking customers and making cash. The credit cards can be used immediately, without having to wait for VC's to cut and send me a check.
  2. IP Confidentiality, since no VC's or angels are in the mix, I don't have to tell anyone about the details of my technology or marketing plans. I keep that close and eliminate the chance of anyone taking advantage of it had I been required to tell them for investment purposes.
  3. 100% ownership retained, I don't have to give 20% of my company to any investors, I don't have to change my customer focused principles to keep the investors happy and I am not pressured to "go public" to give the VC's a big payout. I can run the business at the right pace, namely, the one that benefits the customers first...outsized success for me will come down the line.
  4. Unlike a business loan or VC disbursment which I get in one lump sum, the credit card can be used incrementally. I can therefore shape the level of debt and risk I am carrying as my needs demand.

Of course the main drawback of the credit card funding route is, for the first few months I will be carrying a running balance for the first time in my credit history. The moderately high interest rate on the cards will thus ensure the companies finally get some money from me, but through their credit I will be able to launch the site and if I can acquire revenue to match operating costs within the first few months , the amount in interest I'll be paying out won't be that much at all. Unlike the late 90's when pretty much all new companies had to build their datacenters on site or pay for expensive colocation to build the servers, today , there are many managed hosting providers that allow you to literally manage as many leased servers as you require for a fee.

So here I am at the bet the farm moment, up to now I'd taken a moderate amount of risk in funding the project but it seems I need to really step into the abyss by the act of funding by credit. The amazing thing about this entire episode is how similar it is to the act I took over 10 years ago in taking a loan to get the computer. I had no idea how I would pay off the loan prior to talking it, I knew I would use the computer to fund my job hunt and was confident my skills would allow me to do that, sure enough they were. Fast forward to today, this time my skills have been poured into the distributed web framework and the applications that I will sell as services to customers, again I am stepping into debt but comparatively, I am actually taking a lower risk than I did 10 years ago as a college student on that loan. However, the potential for success is significantly beyond the goal then of getting a good job in IT. I've already signed up with a hosting service and have been working on the required code for providing service options and getting the software installed on the hosts servers. I'll be doing a lot more talking about my products and services in the next few days. Stay tuned!


Francia said…
I am confident that you will succeed.. that all you have done to get your business started will give you the benefits soon. Much Success..

Popular posts from this blog

On the idea of "world wide mush" resulting from "open" development models

A recent article posted in the Wall Street Journal posits that the collectivization of various types of goods or services created by the internet is long term a damaging trend for human societies.

I think that the author misses truths that have been in place that show that collectivization is not a process that started with the internet but has been with us since we started inventing things.

It seems that Mr. Lanier is not properly defining the contexts under which different problems can benefit or suffer from collectivization. He speaks in general terms of the loss of the potential for creators to extract profit from their work but misses that this is and was true of human civilization since we first picked up a rock to use as a crude hammer. New things make old things obsolete and people MUST adapt to what is displaced (be it a former human performance of that task or use of an older product) so as to main…

Engineers versus Programmers

I have found as more non formally trained people enter the coding space, the quality of code that results varies in an interesting way.

The formalities of learning to code in a structured course at University involve often strong focus on "correctness" and efficiency in the form of big O representations for the algorithms created.

Much less focus tends to be placed on what I'll call practical programming, which is the type of code that engineers (note I didn't use "programmers" on purpose) must learn to write.

Programmers are what Universities create, students that can take a defined development environment and within in write an algorithm for computing some sequence or traversing a tree or encoding and decoding a string. Efficiency and invariant rules are guiding development missions. Execution time for creating the solution is often a week or more depending on the professor and their style of teaching code and giving out problems. This type of coding is devo…

Waking Out: A proposal to emerging ethical super intelligence safely.

The zeitgeist of Science fiction is filled with stories that paint a dystopian tale of how human desires to build artificial intelligence can go wrong. From the programmed pathology of HAL in 2001 a space odyssey, to the immediately malevolent emergence of Skynet in The Terminator and later to the humans as energy stores for the advanced AI of the Matrix and today , to the rampage of "hosts" in the new HBO series Westworld.

These stories all have a common theme of probing what happens when our autonomous systems get a mind of their own to some degree and no longer obey their creators but how can we avoid these types of scenarios but still emerge generalized intelligence that will leverage their super intelligence with empathy and consideration the same that we expect from one another? This question is being answered in a way that is mostly hopeful that current methods used in machine learning and specifically deep learning will not emerge skynet or HAL.

I think this is the …