Skip to main content

Accelerating Humanities race to zero.

It's interesting to me how often people confuse the idea of being supported by government systems with the idea that those people are "lazy" or not being productive or creative in any way.

This is the height of the stupidity of such views. Ultimately we WANT to build a society where more people are able to survive without having to work if indeed that is what they want. This situation benefits all humanity as it ALWAYS has.

It is freedom FROM work that got us out of the daily subsistence survival JOB when we learned how to harness the patterns we saw in the environment with regard to locations for water and other sources of natural resource and flora and fauna we needed to survival.

That freedom FROM work got us to think about writing literature, induced us to build surpluses of our now readily gathered natural resources, created the first builders and engineers and craftsmen.

As our ancient ancestors all over the world became good at these things they discovered metal as a resource and learned to work it and used it to more efficiently mine the earth of plants and grain...which gave them even more time to think about ways to store and measure grain, mathematics was born.....writing and trade spread it all over the world.

The ease with which people could survive led to the emergence of art and philosophy and more invention.

So to sit back in technological hubris and with the assumption that there is something wrong with allowing people (any people) to have the choice of not working is not only completely wrong it is ABSURD.

It is freedom FROM work earned at hard edge of labor by our ancestors, built up into our technology and stored in the words of our languages and writing systems.... that has us living the way we do today in a significantly advanced society, mostly free from the grinding dangers of the of the daily act of survival in that environment and able IF WE WISH to create, to invent, to write, to pursue our ambitions or aims or to sleep our lives away.....THAT IS THE GOAL.

My driving aim having created the Action Oriented Workflow paradigm which takes the ability to enable people to free themselves from the NEED to work by leveraging technology,  is to get people to understand this....that we have to inverse this paradigm of thought that presumes freedom from work is some how bad or backward or "lazy".

Nonsense...absolute and complete nonsense, it is the polar is how we got here as a species and if we want to improve,  it is the direction we MUST take all society otherwise with my brothers and sisters in technology rapidly moving toward replacing available sources of human work with automated or autonomous workers (my career for the last 16 years) we people will find ourselves in regimes of discord as displaced labor events accelerate. So leveraging technology to create workforce emancipation by converting systems to AOW driven systems, by building autonomous delivery and transportation systems (drones, robocars, robotrucks), by building autonomous manufacturing robots and facilities for mining and extraction fueled by electricity gathered at oceans of solar panels.

They've already been happening for the last 30 years and arguably since the industrial revolution but the return has over come the loss in terms of enabled freedoms for larger groups of humans (this is why the USG can now afford to support so many people on disability or other problems...again THIS IS GOOD....THIS IS THE GOAL.)

To think otherwise is to miss entirely the previous story of how we got here...which is not supposition it is 100% fact.

The relentless drive towards better ways to build hard drives, processors and networks is reducing the cost to massive compute power every year. Companies like Amazon, Apple, IBM,, SAP, Microsoft and others are building "cloud" infrastructures that other companies are leveraging to make the task of building startups today significantly reduced compared to the I can launch a startup entirely from my bedroom without need to buy a physical server, without need to touch a load balancer, a router  a switch...I don't need to hold a cd or a dvd to install my software on any of the machines I use....I can procure new machines as I need them and deallocate them as I don't need them and I can have them accessible across multiple geographic regions.

To build such a system just 10 years ago would have cost tens of thousands of dollars of physical procurement costs for hardware and hands on need to build it all together in some physical environment. The costs are all gone and I am much "lazier" with the work that would otherwise required dozens of people being done by one.

That has benefited us by allowing services built on such IAAS (infrastructures as a service) to extract value extremely efficiently...and then provide those services at low cost to consumers all over the world.

The race to zero is technology and it is clear that we can leverage technology to allow a race to zero in all areas of human least it was to me a dozen years ago and inspired why I started building AgilEntity and later inventing AOW. It's also why I've set forward to think about how technology used specifically can bring us to a world where humanity is coddled by a self healing infrastructure (SHI).

Getting people all people to a point where they can be lazy if they wish and thus be free to pursue an unbounded path in terms of creative expression is what we want.

May we get to zero with all deliberate speed.



Popular posts from this blog

On the idea of "world wide mush" resulting from "open" development models

A recent article posted in the Wall Street Journal posits that the collectivization of various types of goods or services created by the internet is long term a damaging trend for human societies.

I think that the author misses truths that have been in place that show that collectivization is not a process that started with the internet but has been with us since we started inventing things.

It seems that Mr. Lanier is not properly defining the contexts under which different problems can benefit or suffer from collectivization. He speaks in general terms of the loss of the potential for creators to extract profit from their work but misses that this is and was true of human civilization since we first picked up a rock to use as a crude hammer. New things make old things obsolete and people MUST adapt to what is displaced (be it a former human performance of that task or use of an older product) so as to main…

Engineers versus Programmers

I have found as more non formally trained people enter the coding space, the quality of code that results varies in an interesting way.

The formalities of learning to code in a structured course at University involve often strong focus on "correctness" and efficiency in the form of big O representations for the algorithms created.

Much less focus tends to be placed on what I'll call practical programming, which is the type of code that engineers (note I didn't use "programmers" on purpose) must learn to write.

Programmers are what Universities create, students that can take a defined development environment and within in write an algorithm for computing some sequence or traversing a tree or encoding and decoding a string. Efficiency and invariant rules are guiding development missions. Execution time for creating the solution is often a week or more depending on the professor and their style of teaching code and giving out problems. This type of coding is devo…

Waking Out: A proposal to emerging ethical super intelligence safely.

The zeitgeist of Science fiction is filled with stories that paint a dystopian tale of how human desires to build artificial intelligence can go wrong. From the programmed pathology of HAL in 2001 a space odyssey, to the immediately malevolent emergence of Skynet in The Terminator and later to the humans as energy stores for the advanced AI of the Matrix and today , to the rampage of "hosts" in the new HBO series Westworld.

These stories all have a common theme of probing what happens when our autonomous systems get a mind of their own to some degree and no longer obey their creators but how can we avoid these types of scenarios but still emerge generalized intelligence that will leverage their super intelligence with empathy and consideration the same that we expect from one another? This question is being answered in a way that is mostly hopeful that current methods used in machine learning and specifically deep learning will not emerge skynet or HAL.

I think this is the …