Skip to main content

"Emotions" identity crisis in our Brain confirmed

A recent study has shed light on the distinction between what is normally described as the emotion of fear and other alert systems in the human brain that signal to the brain states of danger.

The research was designed to investigate the responses to stimuli that are exhibited by individuals with a degenerative condition in a part of the brain correlated with emotion, and in particular the emotion of fear...the amygdyla. Urbach-Wiethe disease leaves these individuals with a characteristic inability to feel terror or angst at the sight of many events that are normally immediately traumatic to people without the disease. In it the researchers discovered that the individuals indeed could exhibit fear like responses but did so when they were subjected to carbon dioxide.

In my thoughts and writing on human emotions and consciousness I have created a theory that emotions are only an import factor to the particular experiences that we have as sensed by our standard external senses. Emotions essentially let our neo cortical or conscious mind know of the current experiences which have particular import, they color experience with personal meaning in order to guide behavior. I theorized that consciousness emerges as a dance of the interplay of 4 critical cognitive elements. Incoming sensation and experience, Comparison of sensation to stored experience (memories), evaluation of import of the evaluated experience via emotions and then guidance of behavior via the underlying autonomic internal drives which dictate physiological needs.

The results of this new research provides perfect confirmation of the hypothesis that autonomics and emotion are separate systems with emotions playing a supplemental role to the dynamic of weighing the import of external sensations. It lends weight to the idea that "fear" as we normally understand it, a response to potentially dangerous situations or perceived dangerous situations is in fact a learned behavior a choice of response that doesn't necessarily emerge from an autonomic driver. The fear like response to inhaling carbon dioxide makes sense as a strong signal to modify behavior as CO2 is deadly to life in high concentrations, it would best have a very low level autonomic alert system when encountered that would be triggered independent of an active association of fear induced by an emotion. It makes sense as carbon dioxide is colorless and odorless, unlike the things in the world that we can see are dangerous and learn to associated with a correlated emotional response, CO2 has no way to detect other than the inability to breath....thus when one is exposed to it, an innate response similar to a fear response makes sense as a means to modify behavior and seek to get away from the CO2 source and toward oxygen carrying air.

I posit that the other "emotions" can similarly be decomposed into learned response components and autonomic ones. For example, joy and happiness may be emotional responses that model the autonomic pleasure of orgasmic release. There may be decompositions of anger, envy and other emotions as my work investigating the necessary components of dynamic cognition the creation of a state diagram that would produce the conscious dynamo include emotions and autonomics as weighted factors enabling both to be modulated in fractional ways that can allow any emerged consciousness a wide variety of responses. I feel the resolution of these weights will determine the fluidity of the emerged consciousness to sensory dynamics so far as emotional response is concerned. This may be a key aspect of creating dynamic cognition as controlling the innate response to external stimuli will be fundamental to allowing the emerged mind to be stable. I am looking forward to getting work on coding the elements of the state diagram that I wrote down in 2011 in pursuit of building a dynamic mind and this study gives me confidence that my ideas on the matter at least in the concern of emotions as import factors, have indeed been on the mark.



Popular posts from this blog

Highly targeted Cpg vaccine immunotherapy for a range of cancer


This will surely go down as a seminal advance in cancer therapy. It reads like magic:

So this new approach looks for the specific proteins that are associated with a given tumors resistance to attack by the body's T cells, it then adjusts those T cells to be hyper sensitive to the specific oncogenic proteins targeted. These cells become essentially The Terminator​ T cells in the specific tumor AND have the multiplied effect of traveling along the immune pathway of spreading that the cancer many have metastasized. This is huge squared because it means you can essentially use targeting one tumor to identify and eliminate distal tumors that you many not even realize exist.

This allows the therapy for treating cancer to, for the first time; end the "wack a mole" problem that has frustrated traditional shot gun methods of treatment involving radiation and chemotherapy ...which by their nature unfortunately damage parts of the body that are not cancer laden but …

Engineers versus Programmers

I have found as more non formally trained people enter the coding space, the quality of code that results varies in an interesting way.

The formalities of learning to code in a structured course at University involve often strong focus on "correctness" and efficiency in the form of big O representations for the algorithms created.

Much less focus tends to be placed on what I'll call practical programming, which is the type of code that engineers (note I didn't use "programmers" on purpose) must learn to write.

Programmers are what Universities create, students that can take a defined development environment and within in write an algorithm for computing some sequence or traversing a tree or encoding and decoding a string. Efficiency and invariant rules are guiding development missions. Execution time for creating the solution is often a week or more depending on the professor and their style of teaching code and giving out problems. This type of coding is devo…

First *extra Galactic* planetary scale bodies observed

This headline

So every so often I see a story that has me sitting at the keyboard for a few seconds...actually trying to make sure the story is not some kind of satire site because the headline reads immediately a nonsense.
This headline did just that.
So I proceeded to frantically click through and it appears it was a valid news item from a valid news source and my jaw hit the floor.
Many of you know that we've been finding new planets outside of our solar system for about 25 years now.
In fact the Kepler satellite and other ground observatories have been accelerating their rate of extra-solar planet discoveries in the last few years but those planets are all within our galaxy the Milky Way.
The three major methods used to detect the bulk of planets thus far are wobble detection, radial transit and this method micro lensing which relies on a gravitational effect that was predicted by Einstein in his general theory of relativity exactly 103 years ago.