Skip to main content

Simulating social for the heck of silly.

In a recent article:

"At $16,000 each, the Beam isn't cheap. But Suitable Technologies says it was designed with features that make "pilots" and "locals" feel the remote worker is physically in the room: powerful speakers, highly sensitive microphones and robust wireless connectivity. The company began shipping Beams last month, mostly to tech companies with widely dispersed engineering teams, officials said. "Being there in person is really complicated—commuting there, flying there, all the different ways people have to get there. Beam allows you to be there without all that hassle," said CEO Scott Hassan, beaming in from his office at Willow Garage in nearby Menlo Park."

-- My wager, and the reason I invented Action Oriented Workflow is that systems like this are simply continuing the inefficiency of the old paradigm of stateful work processes.

This is silly, $16,000 per unit to try and simulate a social element that for many workers is not required continuously. So the payment is made for a continuous system that is used in a discontinuous fashion. It's incredible waste.

Instead, much greater value I posit can be derived per worker by providing user opt in social tools, the video chat, the audio calls, the chat and mail interaction...and then letting the work related actions route around the workers where ever they happen to be...this is what Action Oriented Workflow makes possible. People opt in, do work, the system merits them objectively and sends work to them where ever they happen to be when they opt in. No one is pressured to be any where or do anything they didn't explicitly "raise their hand" to do.

I am betting that most companies will find far more value in implementing such a system because the focus is taken off of making social interaction easy for humans who may not want it (big problem) and puts the focus on making the work actions as hyper mobile and social (across the organization) as possible.

The analysis of tele present work forces was something I started devoting serious mind time too, nearly 7 years ago as I was in the midst of implementing the code for the Action Oriented Workflow. The future I saw then and have now made possible by building...involves minimal interactions in office environments which will increasingly be restricted to the agents in business that make critical deals for the entire organization. Pointed social interaction coupled with high value deriving agents will end up being much more efficient and useful than making social the goal and spending money to achieve it just for the sake of it without  any knowledge as to why that would be most beneficial in a quantified manner.



Popular posts from this blog

On the idea of "world wide mush" resulting from "open" development models

A recent article posted in the Wall Street Journal posits that the collectivization of various types of goods or services created by the internet is long term a damaging trend for human societies.

I think that the author misses truths that have been in place that show that collectivization is not a process that started with the internet but has been with us since we started inventing things.

It seems that Mr. Lanier is not properly defining the contexts under which different problems can benefit or suffer from collectivization. He speaks in general terms of the loss of the potential for creators to extract profit from their work but misses that this is and was true of human civilization since we first picked up a rock to use as a crude hammer. New things make old things obsolete and people MUST adapt to what is displaced (be it a former human performance of that task or use of an older product) so as to main…

Engineers versus Programmers

I have found as more non formally trained people enter the coding space, the quality of code that results varies in an interesting way.

The formalities of learning to code in a structured course at University involve often strong focus on "correctness" and efficiency in the form of big O representations for the algorithms created.

Much less focus tends to be placed on what I'll call practical programming, which is the type of code that engineers (note I didn't use "programmers" on purpose) must learn to write.

Programmers are what Universities create, students that can take a defined development environment and within in write an algorithm for computing some sequence or traversing a tree or encoding and decoding a string. Efficiency and invariant rules are guiding development missions. Execution time for creating the solution is often a week or more depending on the professor and their style of teaching code and giving out problems. This type of coding is devo…

Waking Out: A proposal to emerging ethical super intelligence safely.

The zeitgeist of Science fiction is filled with stories that paint a dystopian tale of how human desires to build artificial intelligence can go wrong. From the programmed pathology of HAL in 2001 a space odyssey, to the immediately malevolent emergence of Skynet in The Terminator and later to the humans as energy stores for the advanced AI of the Matrix and today , to the rampage of "hosts" in the new HBO series Westworld.

These stories all have a common theme of probing what happens when our autonomous systems get a mind of their own to some degree and no longer obey their creators but how can we avoid these types of scenarios but still emerge generalized intelligence that will leverage their super intelligence with empathy and consideration the same that we expect from one another? This question is being answered in a way that is mostly hopeful that current methods used in machine learning and specifically deep learning will not emerge skynet or HAL.

I think this is the …