Skip to main content

From differential solution set to Fractal appearance set.

I've given some thought to the recent research published by a team of Scientists that the large scale structure of the Universe looks a lot like the small scale structure of neuronal connections and like the planet scale structure of the connections between computers on the internet.

Here is my explanation for why this is so (yes, this is the type of conversation I prefer to have to the detriment of my dating life) it's simple. From exploration of the class of equations known as differential equations we know that defining the initial conditions of an equation gives rise to a set of solutions for those initial conditions that range often over continuous space. Even if the solutions are not continuous the variation in variables (known as the order of the equation) can be infinite, leading to an open set of possible solutions to the initial equation.

Thus for sufficiently chosen initial conditions any arbitrary solution can be identified for any given equation. It turns out that this is true for those particular equations that have range across continuous space. These tend to have non linear relationships and dynamic variable relationships in dimension (partial)...these type of differential equations are in fact very special...they are the type that are most fitting for solving some of our most complex dynamic systems in the physical world.

Some n'th(where "n" is high not necessarily infinite) order, non linear , partial , differential equations of note:

The Heat equation (how heat energy convects between materials):

The Navier Stokes equation (how fluids [which include gases] flow):

The Schrodinger equation (the governing equation of all quantum mechanics):

The Gravitational Equation (Einstein Field Equation, governs how energy and matter distort space time):

:Looking at those it should be clear why over sufficiently varied initial conditions they seem to give systems of solution that appear similar as the initial conditions vary across wide, near infinite ranges, all vary enough away from any given set of conditions as to appear nearly random....*chaotic* but based on the same kernel the same dna in the form of the initial differential equation and the defined initial conditions. This sounds like self similarity across the solution set and corresponding initial conditions. Fractal systems are a special subclass of Chaotic systems and so from the variations of parameters over infinite sets all those equations appear to create fractal solution sets...which in the aggregate indeed do look alike (not quite random noise...but no real repeatable structures outside of self similar ones). Fractals.

This shouldn't be surprising at all to us, it's not the first time such similarities have been noted but I find it interesting that the connection between the family of solutions that come out of the types of equations that model these systems and how they appear at different scales (essentially different initial condition values) and the similarity across those equations in this because of their identical mathematical form has not been (at least to my knowledge yet made) so I make it here.


Popular posts from this blog

On the idea of "world wide mush" resulting from "open" development models

A recent article posted in the Wall Street Journal posits that the collectivization of various types of goods or services created by the internet is long term a damaging trend for human societies.

I think that the author misses truths that have been in place that show that collectivization is not a process that started with the internet but has been with us since we started inventing things.

It seems that Mr. Lanier is not properly defining the contexts under which different problems can benefit or suffer from collectivization. He speaks in general terms of the loss of the potential for creators to extract profit from their work but misses that this is and was true of human civilization since we first picked up a rock to use as a crude hammer. New things make old things obsolete and people MUST adapt to what is displaced (be it a former human performance of that task or use of an older product) so as to main…

Engineers versus Programmers

I have found as more non formally trained people enter the coding space, the quality of code that results varies in an interesting way.

The formalities of learning to code in a structured course at University involve often strong focus on "correctness" and efficiency in the form of big O representations for the algorithms created.

Much less focus tends to be placed on what I'll call practical programming, which is the type of code that engineers (note I didn't use "programmers" on purpose) must learn to write.

Programmers are what Universities create, students that can take a defined development environment and within in write an algorithm for computing some sequence or traversing a tree or encoding and decoding a string. Efficiency and invariant rules are guiding development missions. Execution time for creating the solution is often a week or more depending on the professor and their style of teaching code and giving out problems. This type of coding is devo…

Waking Out: A proposal to emerging ethical super intelligence safely.

The zeitgeist of Science fiction is filled with stories that paint a dystopian tale of how human desires to build artificial intelligence can go wrong. From the programmed pathology of HAL in 2001 a space odyssey, to the immediately malevolent emergence of Skynet in The Terminator and later to the humans as energy stores for the advanced AI of the Matrix and today , to the rampage of "hosts" in the new HBO series Westworld.

These stories all have a common theme of probing what happens when our autonomous systems get a mind of their own to some degree and no longer obey their creators but how can we avoid these types of scenarios but still emerge generalized intelligence that will leverage their super intelligence with empathy and consideration the same that we expect from one another? This question is being answered in a way that is mostly hopeful that current methods used in machine learning and specifically deep learning will not emerge skynet or HAL.

I think this is the …