- Thou shalt spend at least 50% of ones time thinking about a problem before actually beginning any code. Conceptual design is critical to properly grounding the code in the ballpark of the problem being solved such that the solution spans the problem space as much as possible. Not attending to this stage could lead to spectacularly bad choices of solution for the scope of a problem.
- Thou shalt document everything. Every single thought on the development, ideas of implementation should be written down. I keep multiple "to do" lists in .txt files and as well in the memo field entries for my source control tool when I am checking in new code. Documentation is crucial to illuminating the dynamic thought process that informs code and allows forensic analysis in the event of problems to proceed quickly. Inside code, it goes without saying that any part of code that can't have it's function inferred on inspection should have supplemental comments added to do so...this is why comments are formal part of programming languages, use them or get lost in a sea of code mounting that would require developer time jut to figure out what it does before one even embarks on refactoring it.
- Thou shalt master object oriented programming. Often the debate is made that one has an equal right to choose object oriented (OO) versus procedural methods when coding but this is nonsense. OO is the default truth of reality, biology is OO, engineering is OO, physics (energy transfer and mediation) is OO and coding in that way ultimately returns efficiency benefits down the line that often can't be seen when coding. The basic tenet of code reuse ultimately enables the developer to apply conservation of energy to the act of solving big problems. The extra time that might be taken to code solutions in OO more than returns itself in much easier extension of the code as new needs emerge down the line. In some areas procedural solutions are all that are needed say for various types of scripting but even these can be embedded into an OO process. For example I use an OO workflow and file version management system that allows me to manage changes to procedural scripts so in a way OO is enabling those scripts to be more efficiently managed and executed by composition inside an OO framework.
- Thou shalt socially code as often as possible. Pair programming or extreme programming either through side by side programming of a task or via a visibility workflow system (like action oriented workflow) allows foolish mistakes to be caught as soon as possible. If a developer can get the aid of a buddy to assist in debugging something she's been working on for the last hour to solve the problem in a few seconds with fresh eyes than all those saved hours will add up. The milestones will be hit and more work can be done in less time. Never waste developer time with undo meetings, creative people should be given time to be creative...facilitate their creativity and more work will be done.
- Thou shalt always unit test ones code. Never write more than a few lines of code before testing, OO languages like java, c# make this trivial by provide the main() facility for inline testing of new code. One should never code a new method without testing how it works in main() if that method has more than 5 lines of implementation testing should probably follow with each 5 lines of code written. Catching scope errors, caste errors or null exception errors for passed in attributes during the method implementation stage is far less costly than coding everything up and then deploying the code only to find that the client coding bubbles up nasty pathologies that are hard to find. So testing in main() should be reflexive, writing test code for each method that follows one or all of the possible use cases in client code mandatory as one is writing it and one will encounter much less errors at run time in client code and the ones that one does find will likely be sourced in the client code and will not require refactoring and recompiling in the core class hierarchy.
- Thou shalt always close class instances that can be opened. Classes with "close()" usually do for a very important reason, to prevent some resource access from leaking memory. Be that resource access to a db via an open socket connection or access to a file on a file system, what is opened must be closed. This should not be done as part of an optimization step AFTER coding is complete it should be a core part of coding. Developers should not get lazy about closing opened resource connections otherwise nasty surprises await once client code starts being written and under massive instance creation key resources cause memory leaks that soon crash apps. and there are probably few bugs harder to track down and fix than memory leak bugs..being diligent with closing open resources can remove a significant time sink for debugging once code is deployed.
- Though shalt always use "finally" condition for code that can be catastrophically interrupted. In java and c# some code execution events can be interrupted by catastrophic events (pulled plugs, blown hard drives, dead processor fans) well written code heals from these events either by not implementing the results of a method in non atomic ways (ie. using lots of synchronization and critical sections for code that absolutely MUST run as a unit or not run at all) or by guaranteeing recovery code is run should something happen. Thus both languages have "try" , "catch" , "finally" operations. Open resources in the body of the "try" should always be closed in the "finally". Interrupting exceptions should always be handled in the "catch"...the compile cost of using this condition is far outweighed by final running code that is robust to these type of failures which by the way are another major way in which memory leaks occur.
- Thou shalt always catch and handle exceptions, even if "handle" means "write entry to log". Using exceptions to indicate where code went wrong is a critical aid to debugging, nothing tracks a problem back to it's source better than a well written exception design. Ideally each app. should have it's own set of Exceptions that report app. specific failures and report any such failures to a log file.
- Though shalt always log. Every aspect of a running application should be logged to at least a text file, more elaborate means can include email or xml files meant to report to web pages but logging is critical to ensuring the health state of a running application. As a cross cutting concern to the problem solved by the app. logging is often seen by developers as icing but it is indeed the cake, efficient logging allows errors to be trapped and noted immediately and give a time line of their occurrence that can be used to tie problems to recently implemented code or other issues.
- Though shalt always optimize and use a profiler when available. Profilers allow a running application to be inspected for the long term inefficiency trends in memory utilization and object creation and destruction that can kill an app. for highly scalable uses (ie all the startups that junior coders out of college are writing in hopes they are the next Google or Facebook). Profilers can identify which objects are being created without being destroyed or closed, can show where possible access conflicts loom in code that accesses common resources and can indicate a trend line for how efficiently an app. will scale over time. Most critically to the needs of a running business...profilers allow developers to see how efficient their code is running and where they can gain performance and resource efficiency by simply optimizing code.Tight code is code that does a lot in a little space and is fast and scalable over instances of processing and memory resource...that is critical to the operating cost of the software and the pricing on any services that it provides. Lower pricing for services comes from efficient code which benefits the consumer who chose your service over the other guy on pricing...thus tight code helps you beat the competition. Efficient code is code that puts more money in your pocket once it is pitted against what the competition is doing. Though shalt aim to always reduce the overall code base while adding new features. A truly efficient general approach to a problem is maximally functional while being minimally complex, in the initial feature creation stage code base size scales nearly directly with feature addition as features may be very different but as code reuse of critical elements increases the cost in terms of code base addition for adding new features should reduce over time not grow if the solution is optimal. Optimizations such as name shortening in core classes and UI templates, refactoring of the same and consolidating of block of code that are reused are critical to achieving tight code that runs fast, scales deeply in memory across Users and over all costs less per server....which ultimately benefits the bottom line.
This will surely go down as a seminal advance in cancer therapy. It reads like magic:
So this new approach looks for the specific proteins that are associated with a given tumors resistance to attack by the body's T cells, it then adjusts those T cells to be hyper sensitive to the specific oncogenic proteins targeted. These cells become essentially The Terminator T cells in the specific tumor AND have the multiplied effect of traveling along the immune pathway of spreading that the cancer many have metastasized. This is huge squared because it means you can essentially use targeting one tumor to identify and eliminate distal tumors that you many not even realize exist.
This allows the therapy for treating cancer to, for the first time; end the "wack a mole" problem that has frustrated traditional shot gun methods of treatment involving radiation and chemotherapy ...which by their nature unfortunately damage parts of the body that are not cancer laden but …