Skip to main content

social networks and coming deep personality analysis

An exerpt from this article on the social consequences of social networks and the increasing amount of time that people are spending on them follows:

"but would you want a potential employer to see pictures of you off your head in Ibiza from back in the day? With the latest figures showing that one in 13 of us are using Facebook, this redefinition of public and private is already happening."

This statement assumes that such an incident as some one partying a bit beyond their normal mode in some exotic land would be taken alone as a representation of their character. However this is not at all assured. I see the many data points that people provide on social networks as ways to gain statistical shaping of their average behavior over algorithmic judgments of their behavior over time. It is over time that the invariant nature of personality truly shows up, not in a single picture viewed out of context. That said, the question remains will such a statistical analysis be possible ?

I see absolutely no reason to think it isn't absolutely inevitable. As people built profiles on social networks that track their evolution over years and possibly decades, that deep information about the minutia of human lives will be a gold mine of data for analysis. Already Facebook uses the data from likes and the keywords used in status and wall postings to infer the amenability of individuals to advertisements but this is only a stones throw from inferring how a persons attitudes are changing over time, how those attitudes correlate with indicated life events, how those events shape new behavior. Over the massive sample of people online interacting across all the areas of their life that they can indicate on a social network a new type of predictive analysis will be able to be pieced together. I can imagine a future where such an analysis is done on a persons profile, compiled over 10 years on a site to determine how likely they are to perform certain actions but as well to infer how likely their friends might be. The potential to gain deep insights into the nature of personality will allow businesses with access to such profiles to infer for example, that the revelry in Ibiza was taken out of context or was simply a rare example (out of the set of examples known from the analysis of the sample data) of that person on the edge and should be weighed as insignificant toward the decision to hire that person for a job or some other evaluative reason.

Psychologists and sociologists will lead the way to creating these new deep life analysis tools and their work will be used by marketers to pick out the best targets both for buying their products or services but also for evangelizing those products or services to their friends. A future will come where such analysis will reveal precisely who is more likely to be a gold mine for distributing "the word" for a business. Who is more likely to buy a dress in the next 6 months and why. Who is more likely to be leaving on a vacation in the next 6 months, actions that are difficult to predict without having a specific bit of information stating intention will be predictable form the massive amount of historical data being gathered across multiple areas of interest by the social networks. It is going to be very interesting indeed to see how this shapes what is to come.

Comments

Anonymous said…
What is logically possible is that we are just being simulated on some future google server that has a few idle moments to dream up our lives from the fingerprint our true selves left behind.
David Saintloth said…
Nope, if we live in a multiverse (evidence of which seems to be positive from the recent Bicep2 announcement) I realized a devastating argument to the simulation concept in its entirety...in this post from 2012:

http://sent2null.blogspot.com/2012/11/simulated-universe-suffers-same-problem.html

Popular posts from this blog

the attributes of web 3.0...

As the US economy continues to suffer the doldrums of stagnant investment in many industries, belt tightening budgets in many of the largest cities and continuous rounds of lay offs at some of the oldest of corporations, it is little comfort to those suffering through economic problems that what is happening now, has happened before. True, the severity of the downturn might have been different but the common factors of people and businesses being forced to do more with less is the theme of the times. Like environmental shocks to an ecosystem, stresses to the economic system lead to people hunkering down to last the storm, but it is instructive to realize that during the storm, all that idle time in the shelter affords people the ability to solve previous or existing problems. Likewise, economic downturns enable enterprising individuals and corporations the ability to make bold decisions with regard to marketing , sales or product focus that can lead to incredible gains as the economic

How many cofactors for inducing expression of every cell type?

Another revolution in iPSC technology announced: "Also known as iPS cells, these cells can become virtually any cell type in the human body -- just like embryonic stem cells. Then last year, Gladstone Senior Investigator Sheng Ding, PhD, announced that he had used a combination of small molecules and genetic factors to transform skin cells directly into neural stem cells. Today, Dr. Huang takes a new tack by using one genetic factor -- Sox2 -- to directly reprogram one cell type into another without reverting to the pluripotent state." -- So the method invented by Yamanaka is now refined to rely only 1 cofactor and b) directly generate the target cell type from the source cell type (skin to neuron) without the stem like intermediate stage.  It also mentions that oncogenic triggering was eliminated in their testing. Now comparative methods can be used to discover other types...the question is..is Sox2 critical for all types? It may be that skin to neuron relies on Sox2

AgilEntity Architecture: Action Oriented Workflow

Permissions, fine grained versus management headache The usual method for determining which users can perform a given function on a given object in a managed system, employs providing those Users with specific access rights via the use of permissions. Often these permissions are also able to be granted to collections called Groups, to which Users are added. The combination of Permissions and Groups provides the ability to provide as atomic a dissemination of rights across the User space as possible. However, this granularity comes at the price of reduced efficiency for managing the created permissions and more importantly the Groups that collect Users designated to perform sets of actions. Essentially the Groups serve as access control lists in many systems, which for the variable and often changing environment of business applications means a need to constantly update the ACL’s (groups) in order to add or remove individuals based on their ability to perform cert