Skip to main content

The bigger the paradigm shift the harder it is to predict.

In a recent article at Silicon Alley Insider , a wall street analyst came to the conclusion that Verizon building out a fiber network is a bad idea. I wrote a fast post listing several reasons why the analysis is at best way off the mark.

I extract it here but link to the post below.

The original article at SAI.

The short term (what i call idiot analysis) of a stock always makes me chuckle. If a 15 year wait for return on investment is too long for you Moffet that is you but some investors actually buy on those horizons.

I had to blink at the screen when I read the ending of the article indicating that Moffet thinks the best thing to do now is nothing??? huh??? Like the horse cart manufacturers did as the car came on the scene eh? Where are they now? No, only someone on LSD would do nothing, by acting NOW Verizon does several things.

a) They get first mover in marketing the converged service that will be cheaper for them and us, more powerful in terms of bandwidth provisioning, more reliable thanks to the optical fiber that doesn't need replacement nearly as often as copper.

b) They get to compete with a superior service against the permanently crippled (thanks to their copper cables) cable providers. Even if they take an early hit now, like the proverbial tortoise and hare , the technology advantage of fiber will provide the competitive pressures that really eat into their cake.

c) They get an early start on building or providing network access to products in the home that currently are not networked. The companies that provide the interfaces to these devices will be the ones people go to and recommend to their friends, that can amount to a huge advantage in market dominance as far as mind share is concerned.

The type of analysis that Moffet did suffers from one major flaw, his ignorance of all the ways that Verizon can profit from the new network that are not even currently envisioned by us today. It is like some one mentioned earlier, what if Edison and Westinghouse decided it was too expensive to build out the wirelines. They had no idea that devices like microwave ovens, Radar sets, FM Radio's , CD Players, TV's and computers would ever be connected to them...all they cared about what light and maybe morse code...yet the networks provided the ability for those products to spread to every wired home. Moffet needs to realize he's just as ignorant (or more) of the coming enabled applications that FTTP (fiber to the premises) will provide as Edison was about the usefulness of wired lines.


Popular posts from this blog

On the idea of "world wide mush" resulting from "open" development models

A recent article posted in the Wall Street Journal posits that the collectivization of various types of goods or services created by the internet is long term a damaging trend for human societies.

I think that the author misses truths that have been in place that show that collectivization is not a process that started with the internet but has been with us since we started inventing things.

It seems that Mr. Lanier is not properly defining the contexts under which different problems can benefit or suffer from collectivization. He speaks in general terms of the loss of the potential for creators to extract profit from their work but misses that this is and was true of human civilization since we first picked up a rock to use as a crude hammer. New things make old things obsolete and people MUST adapt to what is displaced (be it a former human performance of that task or use of an older product) so as to main…

Highly targeted Cpg vaccine immunotherapy for a range of cancer


This will surely go down as a seminal advance in cancer therapy. It reads like magic:

So this new approach looks for the specific proteins that are associated with a given tumors resistance to attack by the body's T cells, it then adjusts those T cells to be hyper sensitive to the specific oncogenic proteins targeted. These cells become essentially The Terminator​ T cells in the specific tumor AND have the multiplied effect of traveling along the immune pathway of spreading that the cancer many have metastasized. This is huge squared because it means you can essentially use targeting one tumor to identify and eliminate distal tumors that you many not even realize exist.

This allows the therapy for treating cancer to, for the first time; end the "wack a mole" problem that has frustrated traditional shot gun methods of treatment involving radiation and chemotherapy ...which by their nature unfortunately damage parts of the body that are not cancer laden but …

First *extra Galactic* planetary scale bodies observed

This headline

So every so often I see a story that has me sitting at the keyboard for a few seconds...actually trying to make sure the story is not some kind of satire site because the headline reads immediately a nonsense.
This headline did just that.
So I proceeded to frantically click through and it appears it was a valid news item from a valid news source and my jaw hit the floor.
Many of you know that we've been finding new planets outside of our solar system for about 25 years now.
In fact the Kepler satellite and other ground observatories have been accelerating their rate of extra-solar planet discoveries in the last few years but those planets are all within our galaxy the Milky Way.
The three major methods used to detect the bulk of planets thus far are wobble detection, radial transit and this method micro lensing which relies on a gravitational effect that was predicted by Einstein in his general theory of relativity exactly 103 years ago.