Skip to main content

The bigger the paradigm shift the harder it is to predict.

In a recent article at Silicon Alley Insider , a wall street analyst came to the conclusion that Verizon building out a fiber network is a bad idea. I wrote a fast post listing several reasons why the analysis is at best way off the mark.

I extract it here but link to the post below.

The original article at SAI.

The short term (what i call idiot analysis) of a stock always makes me chuckle. If a 15 year wait for return on investment is too long for you Moffet that is you but some investors actually buy on those horizons.

I had to blink at the screen when I read the ending of the article indicating that Moffet thinks the best thing to do now is nothing??? huh??? Like the horse cart manufacturers did as the car came on the scene eh? Where are they now? No, only someone on LSD would do nothing, by acting NOW Verizon does several things.

a) They get first mover in marketing the converged service that will be cheaper for them and us, more powerful in terms of bandwidth provisioning, more reliable thanks to the optical fiber that doesn't need replacement nearly as often as copper.

b) They get to compete with a superior service against the permanently crippled (thanks to their copper cables) cable providers. Even if they take an early hit now, like the proverbial tortoise and hare , the technology advantage of fiber will provide the competitive pressures that really eat into their cake.

c) They get an early start on building or providing network access to products in the home that currently are not networked. The companies that provide the interfaces to these devices will be the ones people go to and recommend to their friends, that can amount to a huge advantage in market dominance as far as mind share is concerned.

The type of analysis that Moffet did suffers from one major flaw, his ignorance of all the ways that Verizon can profit from the new network that are not even currently envisioned by us today. It is like some one mentioned earlier, what if Edison and Westinghouse decided it was too expensive to build out the wirelines. They had no idea that devices like microwave ovens, Radar sets, FM Radio's , CD Players, TV's and computers would ever be connected to them...all they cared about what light and maybe morse code...yet the networks provided the ability for those products to spread to every wired home. Moffet needs to realize he's just as ignorant (or more) of the coming enabled applications that FTTP (fiber to the premises) will provide as Edison was about the usefulness of wired lines.


Popular posts from this blog

Highly targeted Cpg vaccine immunotherapy for a range of cancer


This will surely go down as a seminal advance in cancer therapy. It reads like magic:

So this new approach looks for the specific proteins that are associated with a given tumors resistance to attack by the body's T cells, it then adjusts those T cells to be hyper sensitive to the specific oncogenic proteins targeted. These cells become essentially The Terminator​ T cells in the specific tumor AND have the multiplied effect of traveling along the immune pathway of spreading that the cancer many have metastasized. This is huge squared because it means you can essentially use targeting one tumor to identify and eliminate distal tumors that you many not even realize exist.

This allows the therapy for treating cancer to, for the first time; end the "wack a mole" problem that has frustrated traditional shot gun methods of treatment involving radiation and chemotherapy ...which by their nature unfortunately damage parts of the body that are not cancer laden but …

Engineers versus Programmers

I have found as more non formally trained people enter the coding space, the quality of code that results varies in an interesting way.

The formalities of learning to code in a structured course at University involve often strong focus on "correctness" and efficiency in the form of big O representations for the algorithms created.

Much less focus tends to be placed on what I'll call practical programming, which is the type of code that engineers (note I didn't use "programmers" on purpose) must learn to write.

Programmers are what Universities create, students that can take a defined development environment and within in write an algorithm for computing some sequence or traversing a tree or encoding and decoding a string. Efficiency and invariant rules are guiding development missions. Execution time for creating the solution is often a week or more depending on the professor and their style of teaching code and giving out problems. This type of coding is devo…

AgilEntity Architecture: Action Oriented Workflow

Permissions, fine grained versus management headache
The usual method for determining which users can perform a given function on a given object in a managed system, employs providing those Users with specific access rights via the use of permissions. Often these permissions are also able to be granted to collections called Groups, to which Users are added. The combination of Permissions and Groups provides the ability to provide as atomic a dissemination of rights across the User space as possible. However, this granularity comes at the price of reduced efficiency for managing the created permissions and more importantly the Groups that collect Users designated to perform sets of actions. Essentially the Groups serve as access control lists in many systems, which for the variable and often changing environment of business applications means a need to constantly update the ACL’s (groups) in order to add or remove individuals based on their ability to perform certain actions. Also, the…