Skip to main content

Weird startup names.

Something I've noticed in this latest internet 2.0 bubble is the confusing and sometimes unbelievable choices that are made by start up founders with regards to naming their businesses. Gone are the days when picking a name is done to hint or indicate the service or product that is sold by the business. Today we get absolutely Machiavellian contrivances that combine various words such as "plurk" or we get other astounding things like "phweet" , your guess is as good as mine as to how that is supposed to be pronounced and god help the person trying to recall the site name at a url field for entry. Here is a list of some of my favorites (sarcasm).

gorb
renku
plurk
phweet
rifttrax
twerq
scribd
shifd
ipartee
kwiqq
blufr
librivox

just to name a few.




It is as if the creators of these sites are more interested in releasing their pretty little thing than in actually making money from the products or services hawked at the site. I mean seriously , "phweet" ????? how does that indicate to me anything about what the site does (allows you to set up calls between your "twitter" friends)? As for plurk , I still don't know what the hell that name has to do with sending short messages, in fact "plurk" and "twitter" I guess could get away with the completely novel element in their names as the type of service they offer , called "micro blogging" by many these days, didn't really have any other name so they just made up a name for the action of sending a mini blurb to your friends or "followers". Still, there are many other sites that perform services that are already done by a thousand other players but rather than feel the need to call that out in the name to hopefully get some business, instead they go and name it something almost unpronounceable....say like Twerq , the search engine I commented on a couple of months ago. A site name should always relate to the service or good offered when possible, if the service is novel (like twitter) you can get away with something completely fabricated but at least make it easy to spell phonetically and easy to guess at the address bar if you have to type it in a browser!

I am having a little good natured rant here but many people are picking names out of novelty instead of thinking about the usefulness of the name or the branding and marketing potential of it. Even if it doesn't sound weird the name could be catchy enough to stick in people's minds and ultimately that is what getting the right name is all about.

It will be interesting to see how many more weird names pop up as the web 2.0 startup craze winds its course.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

the attributes of web 3.0...

As the US economy continues to suffer the doldrums of stagnant investment in many industries, belt tightening budgets in many of the largest cities and continuous rounds of lay offs at some of the oldest of corporations, it is little comfort to those suffering through economic problems that what is happening now, has happened before. True, the severity of the downturn might have been different but the common factors of people and businesses being forced to do more with less is the theme of the times. Like environmental shocks to an ecosystem, stresses to the economic system lead to people hunkering down to last the storm, but it is instructive to realize that during the storm, all that idle time in the shelter affords people the ability to solve previous or existing problems. Likewise, economic downturns enable enterprising individuals and corporations the ability to make bold decisions with regard to marketing , sales or product focus that can lead to incredible gains as the economic ...
1 comment
Read more

How many cofactors for inducing expression of every cell type?

Another revolution in iPSC technology announced: "Also known as iPS cells, these cells can become virtually any cell type in the human body -- just like embryonic stem cells. Then last year, Gladstone Senior Investigator Sheng Ding, PhD, announced that he had used a combination of small molecules and genetic factors to transform skin cells directly into neural stem cells. Today, Dr. Huang takes a new tack by using one genetic factor -- Sox2 -- to directly reprogram one cell type into another without reverting to the pluripotent state." -- So the method invented by Yamanaka is now refined to rely only 1 cofactor and b) directly generate the target cell type from the source cell type (skin to neuron) without the stem like intermediate stage.  It also mentions that oncogenic triggering was eliminated in their testing. Now comparative methods can be used to discover other types...the question is..is Sox2 critical for all types? It may be that skin to neuron relies on Sox2 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

AgilEntity Architecture: Action Oriented Workflow

Permissions, fine grained versus management headache The usual method for determining which users can perform a given function on a given object in a managed system, employs providing those Users with specific access rights via the use of permissions. Often these permissions are also able to be granted to collections called Groups, to which Users are added. The combination of Permissions and Groups provides the ability to provide as atomic a dissemination of rights across the User space as possible. However, this granularity comes at the price of reduced efficiency for managing the created permissions and more importantly the Groups that collect Users designated to perform sets of actions. Essentially the Groups serve as access control lists in many systems, which for the variable and often changing environment of business applications means a need to constantly update the ACL’s (groups) in order to add or remove individuals based on their ability to perform cert...
2 comments
Read more