Skip to main content

monetizing IP in the digital age

The following is a post I wrote in response to this article at the NYTimes web site.

Just wanted to correct a misunderstanding that seems to be rampant here. The idea that the software won't be able to filter legitimate copies from copy violated ones. It is possible for Microsoft to do this but it will be expensive, they would simply monitor the file sharing networks for the illegal copies, determine some unique aspect of those copies and use that in the filter. They would then have to force Zune users to upgrade their players monthly, you know with a nice annoying security alert that can't be turned off, maybe every two weeks to keep up with the flood of copies that will be hitting the net for any particular show. It sounds next to insane yes, but it is not much less insane than the plan itself IMO.

You would think that at this late date the media companies would have realized that the users simply don't want any restrictions on the use of content on their devices. Give up the game and find other ways to monetize the IP, DRM will continue to be rejected or worked around by the consumer as the corporations simply waste money trying to implement it.

Prior to the development of digital media and ubiquitous distribution a la the internet corporations could sit back on a fat collection of IP copyrights and periodically print cash by releasing the products as new consumer technologies appear (VHS > DVD for example) there is no expiration on copyright so this gave these corporations the ability to periodically liven their businesses with old content. The internet has eliminated this endless business model for copyrighted IP by allowing a single copy to eventually spread to the point that the value of the property to the corporations is diluted. The new model for corporations will be to take advantage of the rapid spread of IP content as it is consumed by users. How do they do this? One way which I've come up with is to tie new content IP to the old, for example. You know that the latest Shrek movie will soon be all over BitTorrent for people to download in 6 months , so instead of trying to DRM restrict every possible device that could use that digital data you instead try to make money around the digital distribution. For example, the corporations could release pristine copies of the content *themselves* laden with advertisements for new content that is yet to hit the market. They can also advertise on behalf of third parties, as the content is consumed now, and the IP is diluted they have a built in distribution mechanism for a wide ocean of content categories. If they control the distribution of the "free" content, they now have the ability to take metrics on the effectiveness of the associated advertisements as they spread through bit torrent land. This model allows them to do something else, they could reduce the availability of the content to ONLY the digital media. (No more DVD's...just download from online) this would eliminate the revenue derived from the physical media but that may be compensated by the increased revenue derived from the advertising deals that are struck to distribute the media online in "free" ad supported forms. They have to kiss the cash cow of repeated reinvention of IP away, it is an obsolete model but in a world where cell phones out number pc's and television sets combined, the revenue potential that awaits advertising on a global scale may just make up for what is lost, and then some.


Popular posts from this blog

Highly targeted Cpg vaccine immunotherapy for a range of cancer


This will surely go down as a seminal advance in cancer therapy. It reads like magic:

So this new approach looks for the specific proteins that are associated with a given tumors resistance to attack by the body's T cells, it then adjusts those T cells to be hyper sensitive to the specific oncogenic proteins targeted. These cells become essentially The Terminator​ T cells in the specific tumor AND have the multiplied effect of traveling along the immune pathway of spreading that the cancer many have metastasized. This is huge squared because it means you can essentially use targeting one tumor to identify and eliminate distal tumors that you many not even realize exist.

This allows the therapy for treating cancer to, for the first time; end the "wack a mole" problem that has frustrated traditional shot gun methods of treatment involving radiation and chemotherapy ...which by their nature unfortunately damage parts of the body that are not cancer laden but …

Engineers versus Programmers

I have found as more non formally trained people enter the coding space, the quality of code that results varies in an interesting way.

The formalities of learning to code in a structured course at University involve often strong focus on "correctness" and efficiency in the form of big O representations for the algorithms created.

Much less focus tends to be placed on what I'll call practical programming, which is the type of code that engineers (note I didn't use "programmers" on purpose) must learn to write.

Programmers are what Universities create, students that can take a defined development environment and within in write an algorithm for computing some sequence or traversing a tree or encoding and decoding a string. Efficiency and invariant rules are guiding development missions. Execution time for creating the solution is often a week or more depending on the professor and their style of teaching code and giving out problems. This type of coding is devo…

AgilEntity Architecture: Action Oriented Workflow

Permissions, fine grained versus management headache
The usual method for determining which users can perform a given function on a given object in a managed system, employs providing those Users with specific access rights via the use of permissions. Often these permissions are also able to be granted to collections called Groups, to which Users are added. The combination of Permissions and Groups provides the ability to provide as atomic a dissemination of rights across the User space as possible. However, this granularity comes at the price of reduced efficiency for managing the created permissions and more importantly the Groups that collect Users designated to perform sets of actions. Essentially the Groups serve as access control lists in many systems, which for the variable and often changing environment of business applications means a need to constantly update the ACL’s (groups) in order to add or remove individuals based on their ability to perform certain actions. Also, the…